- Journal Home
- Volume 41 - 2025
- Volume 40 - 2024
- Volume 39 - 2023
- Volume 38 - 2022
- Volume 37 - 2021
- Volume 36 - 2020
- Volume 35 - 2019
- Volume 34 - 2018
- Volume 33 - 2017
- Volume 32 - 2016
- Volume 31 - 2015
- Volume 30 - 2014
- Volume 29 - 2013
- Volume 28 - 2012
- Volume 27 - 2011
- Volume 26 - 2010
- Volume 25 - 2009
Commun. Math. Res., 34 (2018), pp. 296-302.
Published online: 2019-12
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
In this note, we correct a wrong result in a paper of Das et al. with regard to the comparison between the Wiener index and the Zagreb indices for trees (Das K C, Jeon H, Trinajstić N. The comparison between the Wiener index and the Zagreb indices and the eccentric connectivity index for trees. Discrete Appl. Math., 2014, 171: 35–41), and give a simple way to compare the Wiener index and the Zagreb indices for trees. Moreover, the comparison between the Wiener index and the Zagreb indices for unicyclic graphs is carried out.
}, issn = {2707-8523}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.13447/j.1674-5647.2018.04.02}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/cmr/13512.html} }In this note, we correct a wrong result in a paper of Das et al. with regard to the comparison between the Wiener index and the Zagreb indices for trees (Das K C, Jeon H, Trinajstić N. The comparison between the Wiener index and the Zagreb indices and the eccentric connectivity index for trees. Discrete Appl. Math., 2014, 171: 35–41), and give a simple way to compare the Wiener index and the Zagreb indices for trees. Moreover, the comparison between the Wiener index and the Zagreb indices for unicyclic graphs is carried out.